|
AN ACT
Relating to health care and disciplinary actions for health care
providers; authorizing expanded health care practices; creating
a new section; amending RCW 18.130; providing an effective date;
and declaring an emergency.
BE IT
ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON:
NEW SECTION Sec 1.
RCW Chapter 18 is amended to read as follows:
This chapter may be cited as the “Patient Choice in Health Care
Act.”
RCW 18.____ Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is:
(1) to protect a person’s right to seek health care of their
choice;
(2) to assure the people of the state of Washington that they
maintain access to all health care options including
conventional treatment methods as well as other treatment
modalities designed to complement or substitute for conventional
treatment methods; and
(3) to permit health care professionals licensed, certified or
registered by the state of Washington to offer expanded and
complementary or alternative health care treatments in
accordance with this chapter.
RCW 18.
Definitions.
For the purpose of this chapter the terms in this section have
the meanings given.
(2) “Expanded health care practices and services” means health
care and healing methods, modalities, treatments, procedures, or
protocols which have not been generally adopted by a profession,
or which are not generally considered to be within the
prevailing minimum standards of care of a profession, or that
are not standard practices of a profession in a particular
community.
(3) “Licensed health care practitioner” means a health care
practitioner licensed, certified or registered by the state of
Washington to practice a health care profession under a
licensing board or the Department of Health.
(4) “Patient” shall include a patient’s parent, guardian or
conservator, as appropriate.
RCW 18. Right to
Provide Expanded Health Care.
Notwithstanding any other
Washington statutes, administrative rules, and other laws
governing or authorizing health-related professionals to
practice their professions, a licensed health care practitioner
may provide expanded health care practices and services to
patients as long as:
(1) The provider reasonably believes that the treatments or
services have a reasonable basis for potential benefit to the
patient;
(2) the treatment or services do not pose a substantially
greater risk of direct and significant physical or emotional
harm to a patient, when used as directed, than that of
conventional treatment that would have been recommended;
(3) the treatment or services are provided with reasonable
skill and safety according to the practitioner’s knowledge,
education, experience, and training in the expanded health care
practice or service; and
(4) the practitioner complies with the disclosures set forth in
RCW 18._[directly below] of this Act.
RCW 18. Disclosure
Guidelines for Expanded Practice.
Prior to administering or treating a patient with an expanded
health care practice or service, a practitioner shall:
(1) disclose in writing to the patient that a proposed health
care treatment or service is a
treatment modality designed
to complement or substitute for conventional treatment methods;
(2) obtain informed consent from the patient according to
Washington law for providing medical treatments; and
(3) obtain written acknowledgment from the patient that the
patient/ has received the information required by this section.
RCW 18. Evidence;
Complaints; Investigations; Burden of Proof.
(1) Experts; Knowledge and Competency. Notwithstanding, RCW
18.130.080, for any investigation or disciplinary proceeding
regarding a healing act or health care practitioner for
performance of expanded health care practices and services, the
authorized licensing board or regulatory authority shall use
experts who have comparable specialized knowledge, training, and
clinical occupational experience in the practice method or
treatment used by the practitioner being investigated. The
expert must devote the majority of expert’s practice to
methodologies or treatment used by the practitioner being
investigated. The expert’s active medical practice or teaching
experience must have been within five years of the date of the
occurrence giving rise to the disciplinary proceeding. If an
expert fails to meet these requirements, the expert is not
acting in good faith.
(2) Complaints; Investigations.
(a) Notwithstanding any provisions of RCW 18, a complainant or
the complainant’s guardian or legal representative must sign a
written complaint to the disciplining authority regarding
unprofessional conduct, if the complaint is based on use of
expanded and complementary or alternative health care
treatments. The members of the disciplining authority must
determine as to each complaint that there is probable cause to
merit an investigation of the allegations in the complaint by
the disciplining authority.
(b) A practitioner practicing in compliance with this Act may
not have his license or registration revoked, suspended, or
conditioned, or have any other form of reprimand imposed upon
him, or be denied a license, certification or registration based
on the fact that he:
(i) recommended or utilized expanded health care practices; or
(ii) referred a patient to, or co-managed a patient/client
with, a practitioner of expanded health care practices or a
practitioner who is practicing in compliance with this Act or
any other provision of state law.
(c) A complaint
against a license holder or applicant based solely on the use of
a procedure, in the absence of any proof of harm to a patient,
shall not be in good faith and such a complainant is not immune
from suit in a civil action as provided in RCW 18.120.080(3).
(3) Burden of Proof. In any proceeding under this section, the
authorized licensing board or regulatory authority having
jurisdiction over the practitioner bears the burden of proof
regarding the practitioner’s deviation from the requirements
set out in this chapter and must prove a violation of this
chapter by clear and convincing evidence.
Sec. 2. RCW
18.130.180 is amended to read as follows:
The following
conduct, acts, or conditions constitute unprofessional conduct
for any license holder or applicant under the jurisdiction of
this chapter:
(1) The
commission of any act involving moral turpitude, dishonesty, or
corruption relating to the practice of the person’s profession,
whether the act constitutes a crime or not. If the act
constitutes a crime, conviction in a criminal proceeding is not
a condition precedent to disciplinary action. Upon such a
conviction, however, the judgment and sentence is conclusive
evidence at the ensuing disciplinary hearing of the guilt of the
license holder or applicant of the crime described in the
indictment or information, and of the person’s violation of the
statute on which it is based. For the purposes of this section,
conviction includes all instances in which a plea of guilty or
nolo contendere is the basis for the conviction and all
proceedings in which the sentence has been deferred or
suspended. Nothing in this section abrogates rights guaranteed
under chapter 9.96A RCW;
(2)
Misrepresentation or concealment of a material fact in obtaining
a license or in reinstatement thereof;
(3) All
advertising which is false, fraudulent, or misleading;
(4)
Incompetence, negligence, or malpractice which results in injury
to a patient or which creates an unreasonable risk that a
patient may be harmed. The use of a [nontraditional treatment]
procedure by itself shall not constitute unprofessional
conduct, provided that it does not result in injury to a patient
[or create an unreasonable risk that a patient may be harmed]
and the patient has signed a writing that complies with the
requirements set forth in RCW 7.70.060. The writing shall
constitute prima facie evidence that the patient gave his or her
consent to the treatment that is the subject of the complaint;
(5) Suspension,
revocation, or restriction of the individual’s license to
practice any health care profession by competent authority in
any state, federal, or foreign jurisdiction, a certified copy of
the order, stipulation, or agreement being conclusive evidence
of the revocation, suspension, or restriction;
(6) The
possession, use, prescription for use, or distribution of the
controlled substances or legend drugs in any way other than for
legitimate or therapeutic purposes, diversion of controlled
substances or legend drugs, the violation of any drug law, or
prescribing controlled substances for oneself;
(7) Violation of
any state or federal statute or administrative rule regulating
the profession in question, including any statute or rule
defining or establishing standards of patient care or
professional conduct or practice;
(8) Failure to
cooperate with the disciplining authority by:
(a) Not
furnishing any papers or documents;
(b) Not
furnishing in writing a full and complete explanation covering
the matter contained in the complaint filed with the
disciplining authority;
(c) Not
responding to subpoenas issued by the disciplining authority,
whether or not the recipient of the subpoena is the accused in
the proceeding; or
(d) Not
providing reasonable and timely access for authorized
representatives of the disciplining authority seeking to perform
practice reviews at facilities utilized by the license holder;
(9) Failure to
comply with an order issued by the disciplining authority or a
stipulation for informal disposition entered into with the
disciplining authority;
(10) Aiding or
abetting an unlicensed person to practice when a license is
required;
(11) Violations
of rules established by any health agency;
(12) Practice
beyond the scope of practice as defined by law or rule;
(13)
Misrepresentation or fraud in any aspect of the conduct of the
business or profession;
(14) Failure to
adequately supervise auxiliary staff to the extent that the
consumer’s health or safety is at risk;
(15) Engaging in
a profession involving contact with the public while suffering
from a contagious or infectious disease involving serious risk
to public health;
(16) Promotion
for personal gain of any unnecessary or inefficacious drug,
device, treatment, procedure, or service;
(17) Conviction
of any gross misdemeanor or felony relating to the practice of
the person’s profession. For the purposes of this subsection,
conviction includes all instances in which a plea of guilty or
nolo contendere is the basis for conviction and all proceedings
in which the sentence has been deferred or suspended. Nothing
in this section abrogates rights guaranteed under chapter 9.96A
RCW;
(18) The
procuring, or aiding or abetting in procuring, a criminal
abortion;
(19) The
offering, undertaking, or agreeing to cure or treat disease by a
secret method, procedure, treatment, or medicine, or the
treating, operating, or prescribing for any health condition by
a method, means, or procedure which the licensee refuses to
divulge upon demand of the disciplining authority;
(20) The willful
betrayal of a practitioner-patient privilege as recognized by
law;
(21) Violation
of chapter 19.68 RCW;
(22)
Interference with an investigation or disciplinary proceeding by
willful misrepresentation of facts before the disciplining
authority or its authorized representative, or by the use of
threats or harassment against any patient or witness to prevent
them from providing evidence in a disciplinary proceeding or any
other legal action, or by the use of financial inducements to
any patient or witness to prevent or attempt to prevent him or
her from providing evidence in a disciplinary proceeding;
(23) Current
misuse of:
(a) Alcohol;
(b) Controlled
substances; or
(c) Legend
drugs;
(24) Abuse of a
client or patient or sexual contact with a client or patient;
(25) acceptance
of more than a nominal gratuity, hospitality, or subsidy offered
by a representative or vendor of medical or health-related
products or services intended for patients, in contemplation of
a sale or for use in research publishable in professional
journals, where a conflict of interest is presented, as defined
by rules of the disciplining authority, in consultation with the
department, based on recognized professional ethical standards.
Sec 3. RCW 18.130
.020 is amended to read as follows:
Unless the
context clearly requires otherwise, the definitions in this
section apply throughout this chapter.
(1)
“Disciplining authority” means the agency, board, or commission
having the authority to take disciplinary action against a
holder of, or applicant for, a professional or business license
upon a finding of a violation of this chapter or a chapter
specified under RCW 18.130.040.
(2) “Department”
means the department of health.
(3) “Secretary”
means the secretary of health or the secretary’s designee.
(4) “Board”
means any of those boards specified in RCW 18.130.040.
(5) “Commission”
means any of the commissions specified in RCW 18.130.040.
(6) “Unlicensed
practice” means:
(a) Practicing a
profession or operating a business identified in RCW 18.130.040
without holding a valid, unexpired, unrevoked, and unsuspended
to do so, or
(b) Representing
to a consumer, through offerings, advertisements, or use of a
professional title or designation, that the individual is
qualified to practice a profession or operate a business
identified in RCW 18.130.040, without holding a valid,
unexpired, unrevoked, and unsuspended license to do so.
(7)
“Disciplinary action” means sanctions identified in RCW
18.130.160.
(8) “Practice
review” means an investigative audit of records related to the
complaint, without prior identification of specific patient or
consumer names, or an assessment of the conditions,
circumstances, and methods of the professional’s practice
related to the complaint, to determine whether unprofessional
conduct may have been committed.
(9) “Health
agency” means city and county health departments and the
department of health.
(10) “License,”
“licensing,” and “licensure” shall be deemed equivalent to the
terms “license,” “licensing,” licensure,” “certificate,”
“certification,” and “registration” as those terms are defined
in RCW 18.120.020.
(11) “False,
fraudulent, or misleading advertising” means a statement that
includes a misrepresentation of fact that is likely to mislead
or deceive because of a failure to disclose material facts, that
is intended or likely to create false or unjustified
expectations of favorable results, or that includes
representations or implications that in reasonable probability
will cause an ordinarily prudent person to misunderstand or to
be deceived.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 4.
Any pending investigations or disciplinary actions involving
licensed practitioners that could not be brought under the
provisions of this Act must be dismissed. Any disciplinary
sanctions that have been imposed that could not have been
imposed under the provisions of this Act are revoked and must be
expunged without application by the licensed health care
practitioner within sixty days of the effective date of this
Act. Any fines or fees paid shall be refunded. To this extent,
this Act applies retroactively, but in all other respects it
applies prospectively.
NEW SECTION. Sec. 5.
This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the
public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state
government and its existing public institutions, and takes
effect thirty days after passage.
--- END --- |